Why Porn is a Problem
fish Paul & Lori fish


S

ome have inferred what we say about "sexually explicit material " to mean we are not concerned about pornography. Nothing could be farther from the truth, we see porn as a huge problem, and we know it contributes to sexual problems for many, many couples.

The difficulty for us with this issue is that we have an extreme dislike of legalism. The Bible says, "for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life" (2 Cor. 3:6b), and we have seen far too many people destroyed by legalism. We want never to be guilty of adding to God's law or putting on people heavy burdens that God did not intend them to bear. We can not say it's a sin for a man to look at a picture of a naked women he is not married to for two reasons - the Bible does not say (or imply) this, and we are convinced the act it not inherently sinful. Medical personnel see such pictures as part of their training, does this mean one can not become a doctor, nurse, or EMT without sinning?

We should all grow to the point in the Lord that sexual images no longer cause us to lust.
I (Paul) would argue that it's possible for a man to see a naked woman and not lust. In fact I would say that we should all grow to the point in the Lord that such a sight would no longer have the ability to cause us to lust. In our sex crazed and lust filled society such a man is all too rare, but this does not mean such men do not exist.

However this does not mean that we are encouraging the viewing of nudity outside of marriage, or that we think doing so is safe or benign. Many, maybe most, men in America can't even look at a woman in a bathing suit without committing the sin of lust. And even if a man could view pornography without lust, this would not make it a wise or good thing to do. Just because we can do something does not mean we should, and if we want to see such nudity we are not really free of lust.

Lust aside, porn is dangerous and destructive for many reasons:

Porn can be like a cancer - the damage can be rather extensive before any hint of a problem exists. Porn can eat away at the healthy sexuality of a marriage, slowly perverting and destroying what God intended sex in marriage to be.


What is and isn't pornographic?

This is really a judgment call. Some say it's porn if it was designed only to arouse - but teenage boys have for decades used innocent things like the lingerie section of the Sears & Roebuck® catalog and photos in National Geographic as pornography. Others would say anything that depicts nudity is porn - but many medical texts have photos that could affect a man the same way porn does. Art is another difficult area, one man's art is another's porn. Rather than trying to classify these, we think it's better to look at the results, or fruit, of these things. The difficulty here is that we end up with things that produce good fruit in one person and bad fruit in another. (For example the boy who finds his fathers medial texts and uses pictures therein for sexual arousal.) What we are looking for is not just the absence of bad fruit, but also the presence of good fruit. If there is no good fruit then it is one of those things that is at best, "lawful but not profitable."

A man who struggles with lust, or a man who has had past problems with porn, should not view such things.
And what of items like books about sex which are intended to educate, but can also be visually arousing? How do we judge these? Is a book with realistic drawings okay, while a book with photos is not? Is a book with photos of partial nudity but no exposed genitals okay? Where do we draw the line? Again we are dealing with something which is going to be individual. A man who struggles with lust, or a man who has had past problems with porn, should not view such things, but if the man does not have such problems it may be beneficial for the couple to read them together. Once again we are looking at the fruit, both lack of bad fruit and presence of good fruit. If a "marriage manual" helps a couple solve a problem, that is a good thing; if a book is used by one spouse to try and force the other to do something they do not want to do, that is a bad thing. If a web site causes a couple to enjoy sex more that's good; if a web site causes either of them to be dissatisfied with their spouse that's bad.

Sex is a powerful force that has the ability to bless of curse, to do great good or great harm. In a similar way, any image, or words that deal with sex have the potential for great good and great harm. While the Bible does not give us detailed instructions about what is acceptable and what is not, it certainly gives us guidelines and warnings. Playing with fire is a good way to get burned, and ignoring or underestimating the potential for damage is foolish.



....................................................
Another Helpful Article:
How Internet Pornographers target the Male Brain

This page can be found at http://www.themarriagebed.com/printer/problemwithporn.shtml

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The Marriage Bed, Inc.
All Rights Reserved